What I actually did today
- Migrated Supermemory MCP tooling to Gemini File Search - Ported the Supermemory MCP integration onto Gemini File Search, updated scripts, removed deprecated code, and documented a unified CLI workflow for saving and syncing knowledge stores.
- Implemented Gemini File Search document management ops - Added and exercised helpers for listing and deleting documents in the new file-search store, including working around the "cannot delete non‑empty Document" API limitation.
- Consolidated TwinMind coding preferences into the new store - Saved and normalized your current coding rules into Gemini File Search via the
npm run file-search-save flow so AI tooling has a single, up‑to‑date source of truth.
- Tuned AI-assisted dev tooling (GitLens Pro AI + Cursor rules) - Configured GitLens Pro AI and refined Cursor rules to generate commit messages, changelogs, and reviews in your preferred style with less manual editing.
- Set up focused views and cross-device testing for the web app - Created a personalized “Web App → Current Cycle → Octavian” board view in Linear and used ngrok‑exposed pre‑prod to reproduce TwinMind behavior across devices during today’s debugging.
- Explored Storybook interaction tests and CSF configuration - Read through Storybook’s interaction testing model and Component Story Format (CSF) docs, focusing on
defineMain and definePreview and how to wire tests that behave more like real users (using queries instead of brittle test IDs) so that future UI work in TwinMind is easier to exercise.
- Planned a clean Storybook testing strategy for TwinMind - Mapped how to replace some low‑value unit tests with Storybook-driven interaction tests for key components, aiming to keep tests closer to the UI while still being robust and maintainable.
- Diagnosed FileSearchClient architecture smells - Reviewed the Demoni FileSearch/FileSearchClient wrapper and called out that it is doing too many things at once (store management, document operations, search, Gemini integration, librarian, conflict detection), framing a plan to refactor towards single-responsibility functions in line with clean code principles.
- Identified and specified document-handling inconsistencies - Traced how
save uses the Librarian for conflict detection while update coding / sync coding blindly appends or replaces docs, and defined the desired behavior: always run through Librarian so coding updates intelligently replace prior versions instead of duplicating or blowing them away.
- Started design for a safer sync-coding workflow - Clarified that sync coding should not delete all previous rules, but instead merge or supersede them intelligently. Captured this as a requirement so future changes do not accidentally wipe existing knowledge when adding new coding rules.
- Deep-diagnosed Windows performance issues affecting dev work - Spent time tracking down persistent 100% CPU spikes that were making the dev environment unusably laggy. Systematically uninstalled and tested suspects like Grammarly, Olama, Bun, Docker Desktop, FLUX, Warp, Comet, and VS Code Insiders, while checking Task Manager and Cursor behavior to narrow down the root cause.
- Designed stacked PR workflow for TwinMind bugfixes and features - Used Gemini to reason through stacked PRs as a way to break large changes into dependent slices, and decided that having one PR per bug (stacked on top of feature work when needed) is the right level of granularity so reviews stay focused and Greptile-style review tools can be more effective.
- Triaged and structured TwinMind bug bash feedback - Went through Arpit’s and others’ bug bash notes for the TwinMind web app, pulling out issues like inaccessible last-date categories in the mobile sidebar, odd chat gray-out behavior, missing auto-generated to-dos, and annoyances in the audio player and mobile scrolling.
- Fixed multiple-summary-regeneration bug in notes - Used Cursor’s debug mode and hypothesis tooling to track down why regenerating summaries was creating multiple versions. Implemented a ref-guard / state-guard so the regenerate handler only allows one in-flight call at a time, then verified via version history that only a single new summary is created per click.
- Improved summary regeneration UX and safety - Disabled history and copy actions while regeneration is running so users cannot trigger conflicting actions mid-stream. Refactored those controls to use a consistent action-icon-button pattern and tightened state management so the UI clearly reflects when work is in progress.
- Added targeted unit tests around regeneration behavior - Introduced tests that assert the correct button labels (“Regenerate” vs “Regenerating”), verify disabled states during regeneration, and confirm the guard logic blocks concurrent calls. This locks in today’s fix so regressions around multi-click behavior are less likely.
- Outlined Storybook coverage for summary controls - Planned Storybook stories for the summary controls and related UI, so all relevant states (idle, regenerating, disabled actions) are visible and easy to reason about when iterating on the UX.
- Reinforced need for a test-login path for TwinMind - Revisited the friction around Google OAuth on mobile and external environments, and explicitly captured the requirement for a dev-only “test login” path (test user and button) so TwinMind can be exercised easily from phones and constrained devices without fighting OAuth policies.
- Validated and extended the TwinMind bugfix backlog - Cross-checked live behavior against bug-bash items like mobile-scroll limitations, date sidebar issues, audio-player navigation quirks, and transcript highlight timing. Confirmed which issues are reproducible today and identified the ones that should be bundled into upcoming stacked PRs.